Tuesday, August 22, 2023

China's Economic Rise and Future Prospects

 

Dr. Adil Rasheed: China's Economic Rise and Future Prospects

    • 11 November 2007

    It was Napoleon Bonaparte who had presciently warned: "Let China sleep for when she awakes, she will shake the world." However, it seems the votaries of globalization have finally managed to arouse the sleeping giant at their own peril. The result is China's growing ascendance in the world's economic, scientific, militaristic, and political spheres.

    After initiating reforms in 1978, China's economy has grown at close to 10% annually, according to official data. Unofficial estimates believe the figure to be higher. This growth rate has made China the fourth largest economy in the world when measured by nominal GDP, and the second largest when measured by purchasing power parity. Even by the former criteria, China is predicted to surpass Germany to take the third place in early 2008. Many economists also believe that at its present rate of growth, China would overtake the US in overall GDP terms by 2040.

    In addition, China is today the world's largest exporter of information and communications technology products, which is a major factor in the country's $100 billion-plus trade surplus and nearly $200 billion trade surplus with the US. It is already the world's largest mobile-phone market, and the second-largest market for personal computers. China is also the world's top producer of steel, coal, cement, cereal, meat, and cotton. It ranks among the top ten trading nations and is the second largest destination of direct foreign investment in the world. More importantly, it is the second-largest importer of oil in the world, despite being its fifth-largest producer.

    As regards its industrial production, China today produces about two-thirds of the photocopiers, microwave ovens, DVD players and shoes in the world, half the apparel and digital cameras; about one-third the mobile phones; and about two-fifths of the personal computers. To keep its economy growing, it accounts for about 20 per cent of world consumption of copper, 19 per cent of aluminum, 31 per cent of coal, about 27 per cent of steel, and about 50 percent of the world's cement. In the past twelve months alone, China has overtaken Canada as the biggest source of imports to the US, and has overtaken the US as the biggest source of imports to the European Union. The latest Forbes China's richest list has 106 US dollar billionaires, second only to the US. China's biggest company, the state-owned oil giant PetroChina, earlier this month became the largest in the world and the first to exceed $1 trillion (£480bn) in value after its shares almost trebled on their first day of trading in Shanghai. Thus, a single Chinese company suddenly enjoys a market value that is of the size of India's economy.

    Undoubtedly, China's large and fast-growing economy is expected to alter global patterns of production, trade, and pricing, if not even the global political and military order. China's sensational rise on the world economic scene, however, did not take place overnight. It all began in the late 1970s, when the People's Republic of China (PRC) converted its socialist communes to individual households for family farming, and instituted banks for financing enterprises. By the late 1990s, most state enterprises had been sold to private concerns, and banks had been transformed to operate increasingly as businesses.

    Therefore, China's economic boom is clearly founded in its government's responsive attitude to the needs of its economy. The Chinese government has focused on public investment that has resulted in the development of the country's infrastructure, such as good roads and highways, ports, airports, state-of-the-art telecommunication networks, public health, law and order, education, mass transportation, etc. This has undoubtedly propelled the performance of its private sector, which presently constitutes 70% of its economy. In fact, China's efficient financial system has helped its government concentrate its resources in these public investments. The country's directed-credit system channels funds from banks and postal deposits to policy-determined public projects. This system works alongside the usual profit-oriented and competitive financial system.

    Another reason for China's exponential growth is the astuteness of the country's leadership in opening up the economy in a phased and studied manner, without allowing major economic fluctuations or political instability to hurt economic development. The development-oriented ideology of its leadership, its ability to be pro-active and adept at taking necessary economic measures and its effective system of collaborative policy review has been important in giving its economy the necessary impetus and direction. The government has intelligently used modern technology and systems in keeping with the requirements of their economic needs and peculiarities, which its domestic institutions can easily absorb and benefit from.

    Moreover, China's economic rise has been led primarily by domestic demand. Therefore, rather than suffering from slower growth rates, like the US and Asian economies in 2002, China's GDP accelerated right through that period and is still at almost maximum overdrive. Some international parties allege that China¿s economic rise is due to unfair commercial practices, such as violation of intellectual property rights, policies affecting exchange rate levels, accumulation of foreign exchange reserves, subsidies, etc. However, the International Monetary Fund and the US Treasury Department have repeatedly expressed their satisfaction with China's compliance with global standards for fairness.

    Still, several shortcomings and weaknesses challenge China's economic prospects for the future and many international scholars even believe that the country's bulging economic bubble will eventually burst. These scholars see several fault lines in China's political and economic terrain and predict that the Chinese government may be unable to cope with the burden of its own internal contradictions.

    Due to the rapid pace of economic development based on capitalist principles, the Communist government of China is embarrassed to find the growing chasm between the rich and the poor, the booming industrial and the faltering agricultural sector, and the developing urban and declining rural regions of the country. The government admits that just as farmers remain poor, the number of low-income city dwellers is also on the rise and manufacturers are restrained by limited investment in products that meet the market demand.

    Several economists also see the possibility of a sudden collapse of China¿s financial sector because of non-performing loans and the slow-paced liberalization of the sector in market directions. Growing cases of corruption, lack of transparency in banking and other corporate sectors, economic crimes etc. also pose a major challenge to the Chinese economy.

    The central government is also reportedly finding it difficult to discipline the actions of local governments. Local officials have been found to promote their interests by pushing for high investment rates and output levels. The central government is concerned about the adverse consequences of such actions, which it fears could lead to excessive investments, unsold inventories, and local policies that risk nationwide price inflation.

    Finally, Chinese rapid rate of growth may itself prove to be a cause of its undoing, say many economic experts. The Chinese government has been mindful of the threat of "overheating" of the economy and its officials have been warning of introducing measures to curb "investment bubbles," overcapacity, inflation, and unsustainably high-energy consumption.

    Thus, China faces a herculean task of steering its economic juggernaut in the right direction. Moreover, the increasing dependence of the world economy on continued expansion of the Chinese investment boom means that if the Chinese economy runs into trouble it could create significant problems for the world economy as well. Therefore, there is a lot riding on the proverbial Chinese dragon, as it scales new and giddy heights of economic growth and success.

    Stock Market Flash Crashes and Risks of High Frequency Trading


    Dr. Adil Rasheed: Stock Market Flash Crashes and Risks of High Frequency Trading

      • 29 April 2013

      After hacking into the twitter account of an international news agency (Associated Press), criminals send out a message that the White House is under attack and the US President has been injured. Immediately, stock markets press the panic button and high speed algorithmic trading plunges the Dow Jones Industrial Average into virtual free-fall (dropping sharply 143 points), as stocks are dumped in the milliseconds. However, sanity is soon restored as the news is found to be false. Stock markets rebound but only not after Standard and Poor’s has fallen one percent and $136 billion in stock value has been wiped out.

      This narration is not a piece of fiction, but a report of the ‘flash crash’ that hit US stock markets on April, 23, 2013. Surprisingly, this event is also not a freak accident or an unfamiliar occurrence anymore. In today’s global financial markets, the trend of a sudden and precipitous drop, known as a ‘flash crash,’ is becoming increasingly frequent and alarmingly commonplace.

      The above mentioned ‘flash crash’ was not just the first of its kind it was also not the biggest till date. The first ‘flash crash’ took place on May 6, 2010, in which the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1000 points (by 9 percent). There have also been other such crashes involving stocks of major companies, including Google, Apple and Bitcoin. It has also been suggested that commodities like agricultural products, oil and gold remain as vulnerable as the stocks of companies in today’s hi-tech stock exchanges.

      Flash crashes have added a new element of uncertainty into today’s financial markets. Although still a matter of debate and speculation, the occurrence of flash crashes has been attributed to the rise of computers and their high-speed algorithmic trades that are fast replacing human traders on the floors of the world’s biggest bourses. Studies suggest that automated trading in major US and British stock exchanges already constitute over 50 percent of the total volume.

      The use of sophisticated computer algorithms to trade stocks and securities in seconds, or the fraction of a second, is known as High-Frequency Trading (HFT). In fact, HFT involves trading in and out of investment positions tens of thousands of times a day.

      With the introduction of this highly automated form of trading, the human element — particularly human assessment, judgment, initiative and enterprise — seems to be declining in global stock markets. In fact, HFT firms are not only conducting most of the trade in stock exchanges, they are doing so almost entirely with each other, as the human trader is unable to process vast amounts of information or trade as rapidly as them. Thus, even as the conventional human trader continues to look for opportunities on a weekly, monthly or longer-term basis, HFT firms take on short-term trades that involve high risks and rewards, which are often thousands of times higher in returns than those sought by their human counterparts.

      The enthusiasts of this new technology contend that HFT improves market liquidity. They cite various studies that show that transaction costs for traders have substantially decreased with the growth of these systems. They also point out that computers make for better and honest traders, have enhanced attention spans, follow instructions properly, do not allow emotions to cloud their judgment, monitor and process information from many sources simultaneously and cost a lot less.

      On the other hand, the detractors of HFT bewail a long litany of grievances. To begin with, they claim that HFT often causes instability in financial markets and drains out liquidity, especially when it is most needed. They point out that high-frequency liquidity providers had withdrawn from the market, when the May 6, 2010 flash crash was unfolding.

      It has also been claimed that HFT is often used for ‘front-running’, an illegal practice wherein program traders learn about incoming orders before other traders and jump in front to make profits. A study conducted last year by Andrei Kirilenko, the chief economist at the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, found that high frequency traders often make money at the expense of others as their algorithms are capable of gleaning investing patterns of other traders. Some traders also complain that HFT is even used to manipulate markets for economic and even political ends.

      Some market experts have also raised the alarm over the ‘technological arms race’ initiated by the HFT. In order to beat competition, they aver, each HFT firm is increasingly spending large amounts of money on new and expensive technology to outpace rival automated competitors. Many economists suggest that if this ‘technological arms race’ does not stop, average investors will become disillusioned and drop out of the stock markets, which will reduce the real volume of trade and will adversely affect economic welfare.

      But the biggest charge against HFT is that it remains vulnerable to several forms of systemic risks. For example, trading systems may at times demand too much liquidity too quickly and may cause prices to fall or rise to unreasonable levels. Again, it has been found that algorithms at times place large number of unanticipated orders or a trader misuses an algorithm by setting parameters that cause it to trade aggressively (as is alleged to have happened in the May 2010 crash). There is also the possibility of HFT trades getting trapped into a negative feedback loop in which they take turns into responding to each other. The other huge concern is that the system remains vulnerable to hacking or infiltration by terrorists or even a rogue trader betting on a meltdown. The April 23 incident offers a grim warning, as just a sentence-long tweet was picked up by the HFT computers to cause a major market sell-off. This also raises questions about the linking of HFT to social media network for information.

      Current rules and procedures to prevent a ‘flash crash’ range from using circuit-breakers (or so-called ‘kill-switches’) or effecting a five minute pause if trading is unable to occur within the price band for more than 15 seconds. However, these are not viewed as effective solutions by market experts, as the nature of high-volume, high-speed algorithmic trading, is introducing new and unknown variables in stock market operations at a rapid pace. In addition, a flash crash in times of a negative market sentiment will always have the potential of triggering a major meltdown.

      Although the impact of flash crashes has till date been manageable, there is always the possibility that a flash crash caused by automated trading systems might snowball into a major systemic crisis, particularly in times of high volatility and stressed market conditions. There is also the danger that terrorists or criminals design a computer virus that causes major structural damage to global financial markets. In the absence of any serious measure to forestall the problem, it seems an accident is just waiting to happen.

      https://www.ecssr.ae/en/reports_analysis/stock-market-flash-crashes-and-risks-of-high-frequency-trading/